Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Why are we still so hung up on feminine muscles?

Women are building strength for themselves, but a culture still rooted in fear of female power isn’t ready to let go of patriarchal body ideals. 

The female body has long been asked to shrink. That demand was both physical and philosophical. As a culture we’ve prized quietness and smallness in women, with the latter becoming somewhat of a shorthand for virtue – i.e, the less space you occupied, the more acceptable you were.

Muscularity, on the other hand, has always belonged to men (at least in Western patriarchal society). To most of us, muscles signify strength, force, and power. These are all things that imply agency. And agency – as we know – isn’t traditionally the realm of the woman.

Writing for The New Yorker, Lauren Michele Jackson tracks the history of muscularity in America, citing the rise in bodybuilding during the 1980s as a key factor in the nationwide embrace of excessive, flagrant muscle. But this pursuit of the extreme physique was delegated solely to the male half of society. Women, meanwhile, were encouraged to sweat it out in a far more conservative manner.

‘Men sweating in the weight room, women glistening in the aerobics studio – was the gym ever as segregated as that ready image?’ asks Jackson. ‘Perhaps not, though members of the so-called fairer sex were hardly encouraged to remake themselves in Schwarzenegger’s silhouette.’

This is what makes the current rise in female strength training both exhilarating and deeply political. More women are lifting weights, building visible muscle, and reimagining their bodies not as something to be trimmed or subdued, but as something capable. The gym is no longer a place of punishment for having eaten; it is a space to build power.

Beyond the physical aspirations of women choosing weights over pilates, there’s also a powerful usurping of the male gaze wrapped up in this trend. In fact, building more muscle despite cultural disdain for feminine strength is a means of prioritising the female gaze.

Actor Sydney Sweeney made a public case for this shift after recent training to play legendary boxer Christy Martin in an upcoming biopic. Trolls dragged Sweeney online after images of her new bulked-up physique went viral, with thousands of comments (largely from men) criticising her new figure as ‘chunky’ and less attractive.

But Sweeney wasn’t stirred. She clapped back with a video compilation of the cruel comments followed by a series of her intense training sessions. The message was clear: Sweeney wasn’t there to appease the eyes of her followers. She was there to get stronger, healthier, and do her job.

What seems to irk these men so much is that a woman they once regarded as attractive has chosen to shirk the version of herself that existed to be looked at. To them, it seems unfathomable that a woman would choose to exist outside the realm of the male gaze, and this act of agency angers the misogynist like nothing else – because, crucially, it removes his power.

This cognitive dissonance has deep roots. In 1985, the documentary Pumping Iron II: The Women followed female bodybuilders like Bev Francis, whose muscular physique was seen as transgressive. Francis was punished by judges for looking ‘too masculine’ – a category that, for women, often functions as a euphemism for ‘too powerful.’

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Sydney Sweeney (@sydney_sweeney)

Female muscles are also wrapped up in deeply political discourse. As Bonnie Tsui points out, the phrase ‘too muscular’ is also used to ‘disparage transgender women and intersex athletes with naturally high levels of testosterone. The growing controversy over the participation of transgender women in athletic competition is rooted in muscle, and the perceived unfairness of muscles that come with puberty.’

Women are turning to strength training not for external validation, but to feel capable in their own bodies. They’re lifting heavy, not to meet some newly commodified beauty standard, but to protect their bones, to fight aging, to quiet anxiety, to find a version of themselves that doesn’t depend on being approved of.

The irony is that for all the talk of female empowerment in advertising, fashion, and social media, physical strength remains one of the last frontiers where real discomfort lingers. When a woman gains muscle, she doesn’t just gain strength. She becomes harder to overlook. She takes up more space, both literally and symbolically.

There is no need to romanticise the gym or frame weightlifting as a universal solution to female oppression. But it does matter that women are increasingly choosing strength for themselves – and that they are doing so without asking for permission.

Strength is no longer a performance for the male gaze, but a form of personal infrastructure.

And like any kind of infrastructure, it cannot be easily undone. Muscle takes time. It requires fuel and repetition. It flies in the face of restriction and fragility. It insists on visibility. That is its threat, and its power.

Accessibility